<---previous article

ICOC Paper -
The Relationship of Baluch Weavings To An Earlier Anatolian Model

by Tom Cole

This paper was part of the poster session at the recent ICOC in Istanbul in April, 2007. Though the idea is hardly 'new', the publication of the history that follows is fresh material (as fresh as history can be!) along with the juxtaposition of these photos. Much of the historical text that follows was derived from notes given to me by Jerry Anderson as a gift to share with others.



1. Detail - early Anatolian carpet depicting birds upon which the Baluch model must have been patterned.


If one goes through the Turk ve  Islami Museum in Istanbul and views the Seljuk period material housed there, it is apparent there are two types of weavings there, one of which seems very Turkmen inspired (or rather, an aesthetic which inspired later Turkmen weavers) and the other is one where the weavings appear to bear an affinity with Baluch weavings, mostly those from Khorassan or NE Persia but colourful aesthetic of Seistan and w. Afghanstan is reflected as well.

The reasons for this apparent phenomenon may remain obscured in histories that are not fully documented or fully understood, but the ethnogenesis of the Baluch weavers is a convoluted one and one which may be traced back to the earliest tribal name which is used t in rug studies, the  Saka  or (Scythians).  The Scythians were an Indo-European group located in Central Asia, a group which was eventually moved out through confrontations with the Turko/Mongol hordes of the region.  Inevitably in the course of these military confrontations, some of the Sakas were left behind, conquered, incorporated into the Turko-Mongol culture.




2. A Baluch 'bird bag face', note the similarity in the patterns on the sides of the birds, possibly representing a type of mount upon which a rider might be seated.


“The result of a great battle was that many of the women passed over to new masters; the captive youths became warriors , usuallyunder their own chiefs, but subject to the supreme control of the conqueror;....  Slave and master lived very much in the same way, the only difference being that one did the menial work whilst the other enjoyed himself; meanwhile the women, habituated to the idea of passing from one man to the other,

even in their own tribes, only had to undergo the rough excitement of an extra embrace from a man who was not of their own particular choice. Under such circumstances, though the main distinctions of Hsiung-nu and Tungus are always preserved, it is not to be wondered at that languages got intermingled, tribes hopelessy mixed up, and customs interchanged."



3. Line drawings of the Anatolian models for birds as seen in early weavings.


But the majority of them moved along, westward, flowing south through Khorassan province in Persia into the Seistan region of today.  At one point, this area was called “Saka-stan” (place of the Sakas), but at the time of the Arab invasion in the 7-8th century, the name was changed to Sidjistan, and from that was adapted the present name of Seistan.

The Baluch of Seistan are a Brahui speaking people of mainly highland Baluchistan, parts of Sind, Khorassan and W. Afghanistan (& Turkestan), who are of Aryo-Scythian origin.  I

ncluded in this are the eastern Scyths who conquered old Nimroze (SW Afghanistan [Chakanshur]) in 131 BC and originally named the region “Sakastan” after themselves.  The actual rug weaving region of Seistan is located in the northern part of the region, with Zabul as the major or capital city of the area.   While Brahui is spoken, the lingua franca is Farsi, a language which evolved from the Indo-European tongue of the Scythians.





The predominant weavers of Seistan are the Sharakhi and Sarabandi tribes, descendents of the original Saka hordes.  Believed to be related to the Sakas of Sarmatian and Alan origins from the Sakas of southern Russia. “Herodotus reported that the Sarmatians were said to be the offsprings of Scythians  who had mated with Amazons and that their female descendants "have continued from that day to the present to observe their ancient [Amazon] customs, frequently hunting on horseback with their husbands; in war taking the field; and wearing the very same dress as the men" Moreover, said Herodotus, "No girl shall wed till she has killed a man in battle."

The Alani people are another steppe horde group who were originally listed by ancient Chinese sources as one of the four “Hunnish” tribes. The Alans, from whom the modern Ossetians claim descent, were a branch of the Sarmatians descended from a mélange of peoples, including Eastern tribes such as the Massagetae Regarded as a nomadic and pastoral people of unknown ethnological affinities who originated in north Central Asia, they were organized in a predominantly military manner.




Divided into hordes, they undertook extensive independent campaigns, living off the countries they ravaged. The Huns have been described as short and of somewhat Mongolian appearance. Their military superiority was due to their small, rapid horses, on which they practically lived, even eating and negotiating treaties on horseback much like the Mongols and Turks, living the same lifestyle and inevitably related to them.  
Originally identified as the precurosors or ancestors of these Huns were the Hsiung-nu, a nomadic horse people who confronted the early Chinese empire precipitating the construction of the Great Wall. Actually, the Mongol hordes (particularly those who conquered Russia and penetrated as far as Hungary and Germany) included large elements of Turkic peoples; they came to be known collectively as Tatars.




Timur, who conquered most of the Jagatai Khanate in the 14th century, and founded a new empire, claimed descent from Genghiz Khan, as did Babur, who in the 16th century founded the Mughal (i.e., Mongol) empire in India. The Mongols were completely expelled from China by 1382 and soon thereafter lapsed into relative poltical obscurity but their cultural legacy and customs persisted among the scattered peoples who formerly comprised the tribal core..

The origins of the Turkmen, too, include familiar names, Sarmatian, Alani, Massa Gettae and Parthians and apparently the earliest reference to the Turkmen may be as early as the 6-7th century.     

But Turkmen history begins in the minds of most rug people with the emergence of the Oghuz horde and the establishment of Seljuk domination.  The Oghuz were composed of 24 constituent tribes, some of which bore names with which we are familiar today, including Salor.

 




7. Early Anatolian pile weaving with a border similar to that seen in Baluch weavings from Afghanistan


In the last decade of the 10th century, the Seljuq family embraced Islam, and then turned to raiding against the pagan Turks. (Some Russian scholars have expressed an opinion that the Seljuq family accepted Islam through Christianity, because of the Biblical names of his sons, Mikail, Musa and Israil). Over the next decades, Musa, Mikail and Arslan Israil, the three sons of Seljuq moved southwards for pasture.. Soon afterwards, Mikail's two sons, Chaghri Beg and Tughril Beg occupied Khorassan in 1040AD, and extended their influence in Iran, and founded rule of the Great Seljuqs with aid of armies composed of Turkmen nomads. They defeated the Ghaznavids in the Battle of Dandanqan (1040) and won control of Khorassan before moving west to take the regions of Rayy (1042) and Isfahan (1051).

The borders of the state covered an area from the Marmara Sea to the Balkhash Lake in Central Asia and from the Caucasus, the Caspian Sea and the Aral Sea to the borders of India and Yemen.

The Seljuks tried to establish a unified empire by adopting a central administration along Persian lines and creating slave armies that would reduce their dependence on the unruly Turkmen nomads who had conquered the empire, a strategy notably employed in Khorassan.  Some of these ‘slave armies’ inevitably included vassal tribes who swore allegiance to the Seljuk rulers, incorporating themselves into the lifestyle of the rulers, a typical practice in these early times.




8. 'Baluch' bag face, with the same border as seen in the Anatolian rug directly above


Which now leaves us with the rugs.  Often to assume connections of an uninterrupted flow of design and aesthetics perpetuated over such a long period of time has been considered debateable at best, and presumptuous as well as irresponsible and undocumented at worst.  I have always been

one to engage in the speculative as to ignore what is truly the physical evidence of the relevant, extant 19th century weavings somehow seems inappropriate.  “Reading” the rugs is sometimes more revealing than studying histories and textual verbiage out of context.

 




9. Early Anatolian rug (18th century) with a pattern that is familiar to some weavings of the Baluch



10.. 'Baluch' balisht (detail), SE Persia. Note the obvious relationship between the earlier Anatolian model and this 19th century weaving.






11.
. Detail Baluch Bag Face, Khorassan with animal style iconography and the distinctive use of a corrosive dye for the ground.


Detail from an early Anatolian carpet, note the similarity in aesthetics (ie. use of corroded ground) to the Baluch example just above.




Left -Seljuk period Anatolian fragment. Right -Baluch animal trapping, Khorassan Province, NE Persia, late 19th century




Above - Compartmented Anatolian carpet, Vakiflar Museum, Istanbul


Below -Baluch "Chanteh" with a similar design layout



Acknowledgements

“My thanks to Jerry Anderson for much of the information contained within this paper and for the inspiration to follow a path he travelled for so long…..”